As a massive Titleist fan, i could buy a full set of T-MB irons 3-pw, then 50,56,69 Vokey wedges and even Titleist fairways woods and driver and then get a Scotty Cameron and still have change

No Need for these irons, The Apex and they are still selling The X2 Hot NEW in stores.
Best irons Callaway has had in 20 Years.

doesn’t the loft being low have a difference on the spin rate surely you should compare it to the nearest loft wise not club number

not sure about the LZ shaft but a 6.0 for Project X IS in fact, extra-stiff or stiff+ lol. 5.0 = R+, 5.5 = stiff, 6.0 = S+ for my PXi shafts, I am assuming the LZ follows the same formula. Just for reference I play quite stiff irons, swing to about 110 Driver speed and I use 5.5 in PX. Just saying a 6.0 for them is extra stiff 😉 Good video though rick. Seem to have spin issues with all of callaways new long bombing irons over the years.

now callaway is tied with taylormade. drivers and irons.

you can’t comment on clubs when you can find the middle
like wtf pal
really ????

Rick cmon they look super ugly ! Nothing like the mizuno MP-4

epic irons are junk

These are nothing but an updated copy of the Fusion irons that came out about eight years ago. At the time, they were also overpriced.

Range from pw to 4 irons 135-235 yards! Nothing extraordinary ! And one pays 1500 to 2000 usd. So what is callaway offering the clubs will make the golfer a better player or one carries a price ego. Logic is bewildering!

It’s analogous to the difference between an $500 Bulova watch and a $10,000 Rolex Daytona. Both tell time quite well, but one comes with the brag bag.

That said, I am betting that the performance difference will be greater for more average swing speeds. The same is true of the Epic Driver – if you go 290+ with your old Driver, than you won’t see huge distance changes. If, however, your current Driver is a 250-260 club, then the jump can be quite impressive.  Likewise, I would surmise that the Epic Pro irons are going to deliver 5-15 yards of improved distance and a much tighter dispersion pattern.

The question is always the same, however – is the difference worth it to you?  If so – enjoy, if not – move on.  I do like the look, I must confess – and I do prefer the Rolex, but I can only afford the Bulova.

That’s what you said on all the clubs you review!!!!Pathetic!

These are a ripoff of the Taylormade M2 irons design. And a ripoff

That’s just to much

I feel like these clubs were made not to make huge sales but to draw people to their cheaper models. Almost as a comparison.

That doesn’t look or perform like a “prestigious” club. Sticking with my cf16s

Rick could you do an article on stack and tilt golf swing explaining the advantages and disadvantages or even doing a round of golf using this method that would be great cheers Carl

When will Rob Potter test the Epic?

could you do some reviews on bomb tech equipment. I am interested in their stuff but don’t want to buy it if it’s garbage. @rickshiels

The spin numbers are because of the shafts in there. Normally Rick plays the non LZ models. HUGE HUGE HUGE DIFFERENCE!

Rick please get your normal shafts in there and re do

I have cf16s and I would not change them for anything.

If only they had hired some designers with taste when they started throwing money at this project. They could have fed photos of game improvement irons into the computer and said this is not what we are after, alas they look exactly like game improvement irons with a colour scheme that suggests bargain basement. I think somebody must have accidentally dropped photos from inside a Tart’s knicker drawer into the computer; they wouldnt look out of place there 😉