► Neil Tappin tests the latest non-adjustable driver from TaylorMade – the TaylorMade M6 up against the previous generation TaylorMade M4
► Become a FREE SUBSCRIBER to Golf Monthly’s YouTube page now – https://www.youtube.com/golfmonthly
► For the latest reviews, new gear launches and tour news, visit our website here – http://www.golf-monthly.co.uk/
► Like us on Facebook here – https://www.facebook.com/GolfMonthlyMagazine
►Follow us on Twitter here – https://twitter.com/GolfMonthly
►Feel free to comment below!
►Remember to hit that LIKE button if you enjoyed it 🙂
AWS.ECommerceService.NoExactMatches: We did not find any matches for your request.
If there is a difference between the M4 and M6 it is in appearance rather than performance. If I was looking for a TaylorMade driver, I would buy an M4 as soon as they go on sale, and save more than enough to buy another fairway wood or hybrid. B-T-W, my driver is a Callaway Epic, with a 44′ Fujukura Speeder 661 shaft – I did not lose ANY swing speed with the shorter shaft and hit more fairways due to increased control.
Hi, why did you take out miss hits when the whole selling point of the m6 is higher COR from across the whole club face. We all know if a clubs hit out of the sweet spot that they all pretty much got the same distance. Thanks Andy
Looks like copy of cobra on M6. Same girl different dress.
Not with the extra $. However, I have the M5 M6 hack: remove the screws, loosen the resin with a small drill, dump out the loose resin, reinstall the screws. 10 extra mph clubhead speed. Mission accomplished.
Thanks Taylor made, 1 mph more ballspeed for only $500.00!!!
Driver is another new paint job hiding no real tech advance. Lovely course though. Where is it?
i was looking at getting a new m3 or m4 but the didn’t like the look down at the ball like the new look now tho matte looks nice
When shall the fairway woods and hybrids be tested?
Clubs are getting so expensive now, improvements don’t justify the cost increase for me. When will manufacturers wise up.
i think they look uglier than the m4
Who agrees
Unless you have an older driver it doesn’t seem worth the money to replace your current gamer. I will still test them when available but doubtful that I would spend the money for basically the same results.
Thanks for the review Neil, basically striping away the Marketing/Tech speak there is only an incremental improvement from the new and previous models.
But I just don’t believe the TM story line with “Speed Injected Twist Face”, this is classic TM Marketing Bull Shit! Knowing how bad their quality control is, do they seriously want us to believe each club is inspected/measured and they injected EVERY head with the exact amount of resin to get EVERY driver to the absolute limit of COR. I smell TM BS here! The give away is that the USGA & R&A measurement is no longer a measurement of COR!
When will TM learn that not every Golfer is STUPID!
500 quid for an extra one yard, they are just taking the pee …
All the reviews are done by pros. I’m more interested in tests done by 5 to 15 handicappers who are the real golfers.
I haven’t seen it in person but I love the look.
A smash factor of 1.41 or 1.43 with a driver is not that good…
m4 all day
Overall appearance is much improved in my opinion..
The main difference between the M4 & the M6 is, 2.